<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live for the Moment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cambiareproductions.com/2007/11/14/live-for-the-moment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cambiareproductions.com/2007/11/14/live-for-the-moment/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Grote</title>
		<link>http://blog.cambiareproductions.com/2007/11/14/live-for-the-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Grote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cambiareproductions.com/2007/11/14/live-for-the-moment/#comment-1410</guid>
		<description>Hey Travis - thanks for the thoughtful piece.  To answer your question, the play was actually started in 2001, in the immediate aftermath of 9/11.  I finished the first draft in 2002, and stopped working on it in 2003.  So you&#039;re right that it has a raw, somewhat clunky, take on 9/11, and also that it was a warning of events that have come true, more or less.  I should note that, for good or ill, the images of 9/11 are not written into the play, though the play does explicitly refer to that day&#039;s events.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I was also a less skilled writer then than I am now - by way of comparison, 1001 (written in 2004-05, premiered in 2007) deals with the emotional reality of 9/11 but doesn&#039;t refer to the literal event.  There are a couple of things in 1001 that might date it - a scene in the now Hamas-run Gaza, for instance, or a reference to Bush as president - but as it is a work of the early 21st century, I might choose to leave it.  I just saw Edward Albee&#039;s Peter and Jerry, for example, and the attempts to update it just seemed kind of clunky and awkward.  Amusingly, though, the line &quot;Time&#039;s not for blockheads&quot; became a laugh line, one imagines because of the sad state of American journalism...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Travis &#8211; thanks for the thoughtful piece.  To answer your question, the play was actually started in 2001, in the immediate aftermath of 9/11.  I finished the first draft in 2002, and stopped working on it in 2003.  So you&#8217;re right that it has a raw, somewhat clunky, take on 9/11, and also that it was a warning of events that have come true, more or less.  I should note that, for good or ill, the images of 9/11 are not written into the play, though the play does explicitly refer to that day&#8217;s events.</p>
<p>I was also a less skilled writer then than I am now &#8211; by way of comparison, 1001 (written in 2004-05, premiered in 2007) deals with the emotional reality of 9/11 but doesn&#8217;t refer to the literal event.  There are a couple of things in 1001 that might date it &#8211; a scene in the now Hamas-run Gaza, for instance, or a reference to Bush as president &#8211; but as it is a work of the early 21st century, I might choose to leave it.  I just saw Edward Albee&#8217;s Peter and Jerry, for example, and the attempts to update it just seemed kind of clunky and awkward.  Amusingly, though, the line &#8220;Time&#8217;s not for blockheads&#8221; became a laugh line, one imagines because of the sad state of American journalism&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

